Model Risk
When a model is wrong, or right for the wrong reasons, and no one catches it, the decisions it drives keep compounding the error. That's model risk.
Model risk is the potential for harm when an AI or analytical model produces inaccurate results, is used outside the context it was designed for, or continues operating after its performance has quietly degraded. A model can be mathematically sound and still cause harm—if it was trained on unrepresentative data, applied to a population it wasn't validated on, or used to make decisions its designers never intended. Financial services regulators have formalized this discipline for decades, but it applies to any organization using models to influence consequential decisions: credit, hiring, pricing, fraud detection, clinical triage.
These systems tend to operate in the background, which is exactly what makes their failures dangerous. A degraded model doesn't stop; it keeps approving, rejecting, filtering, flagging. The harm accumulates before anyone notices, and by the time it surfaces through a regulatory finding or a pattern of bad outcomes, the exposure is already significant. For executives, that makes model risk a governance question as much as a technical one: which models are making consequential decisions, who validated them, who is watching them now, and who is accountable if they fail.
Continue path
Shadow AI
The governance risk hiding in ungoverned employee AI use
Optional map
Concept neighborhood
Focused neighborhood
Model Risk
When a model is wrong, or right for the wrong reasons, and no one catches it, the decisions it drives keep compounding the error. That's model risk.
In these paths
Selected concept
Directly related
One step further
via AI Risk Management
via Model Monitoring
via AI Governance
via Auditability